Editorial: Tinubu Honors Keyamo - A Prize for Presiding Over Failure

 

In a country already suffocating under the weight of institutional decay, and gasping for credibility and competence, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to confer an “Excellence in Aviation Sector Reforms” award on Festus Keyamo, Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, is not merely misguided; it is an act of breathtaking cynicism that insults the intelligence of Nigerians, and the thousands who suffer daily within the decaying walls of our airports and the collapsing infrastructure of our aviation industry. It is a pronouncement so divorced from empirical reality that it can only be interpreted as either willful dishonesty or profound contempt for the Nigerian public. To call this honor undeserved is charitable. It is less an award than an elaborate public relations exercise masking the rot, chaos, and sheer neglect that define Nigeria’s aviation sector today. In truth, it is an affront to reason, to evidence, and to the daily lived experiences of Nigerians forced to navigate a catastrophically mismanaged aviation sector.

 

Let’s be clear: there is no excellence - measurable, observable, or defensible - in Nigeria’s aviation sector today; not operational excellence in the skies, not infrastructural excellence in the terminals, not regulatory excellence in the policies. Nothing. Under Keyamo’s glaringly ineffective stewardship, the nation’s air travel system has sunk deeper into dysfunction. The sector has not stabilized, modernized, or reformed; it has continued to deteriorate along well-documented fault lines. Airports remain dimly lit monuments to neglect. Airports across the country remain dark, poorly ventilated, and unsafe. Runways are riddled with potholes; terminals are outdated, overcrowded, and often without basic amenities like working air conditioners or potable water. Luggage systems fail, flight delays are rampant and endemic, and airlines; crippled by forex scarcity and punitive taxes, struggle to stay afloat. Safety assurances inspire little confidence, and passenger dignity is treated as expendable. Yet, this is the “reform” for which President Tinubu deemed it fit to roll out the red carpet.

 

The Nigerian aviation sector, which should be a beacon of our national modernization, and critical engine of economic integration and national mobility, has instead devolved into a tragic case study and textbook example of mismanagement and administrative incompetence compounded by policy incoherence. Airfare costs have skyrocketed to prohibitive levels, beyond the reach of average Nigerians, transforming air travel into a privilege reserved for the affluent, even as service quality continues its unimpeded decline. The government’s regulatory posture, instead of creating a fair and sustainable environment for airlines, has become a patchwork of inconsistent directives, half-baked interventions, and hollow promises. Rather than implementing coherent, industry-facing policy frameworks, the government has subjected airlines to erratic regulations, fiscal hostility, and an atmosphere of chronic uncertainty.

 

The award citation’s language - breathlessly touting “repositioning for global competitiveness” - would be laughable if it were not so insulting. Foreign carriers have openly complained, repeatedly and publicly, about vast sums of repatriation funds trapped by the Nigerian state. Some have issued formal warnings about scaling back or suspending operations entirely. Domestic airlines, meanwhile, are collapsing with disturbing regularity, crushed beneath soaring fuel prices, lack of spare parts, foreign exchange scarcity, systemic neglect, and an absent regulatory conscience. Passengers are forced to endure cancellations without recourse, safety scares, and extortion at every checkpoint. Against this backdrop, what exactly is Keyamo being rewarded for? Symbolic gestures and cosmetic branding exercises with the introduction of new uniforms and logos? The endless international junkets disguised as “aviation summits”? The creative manipulation of statistics that paint decay as progress and inertia is sold as achievement? Or perhaps, ministerial grandstanding at international conferences where Nigeria’s problems are rhetorically acknowledged but substantively ignored? 

For decades, Nigeria’s aviation industry has demanded true reform, rooted in modern regulation, and professional stewardship. Aviation professionals, regulators, and stakeholders have articulated, with exhausting clarity, what genuine reform requires: transparent governance, modernized infrastructure, financial realism, depoliticized regulation, and technical expertise over partisan loyalty. None of these prerequisites has been meaningfully met. Instead, the public is subjected to ceremonial pageantry in which failure is rewarded, scrutiny is evaded, and mediocrity is elevated to the status of virtue. What we’ve gotten instead is a stage-managed award ceremony where failure is dressed up as success and where ministers are lauded for presiding over the slow-motion collapse of an essential national artery.

 

President Tinubu’s gesture exposes a deeper pathology within the Nigerian governing tradition, and reveals something deeply troubling about the culture of governance in Abuja: honors are now doled out not for achievement, but for loyalty. In such a culture, marked by the systematic substitution of loyalty for competence, optics for outcomes, and ceremonial validation for material progress, honors are not instruments of accountability; they are tools of appeasement. Excellence is no longer something achieved; it is something decreed. The optics of governance take precedence over the substance of service delivery. It is a pattern that cheapens public accountability and mocks true excellence. By rewarding a minister who has offered Nigerians only excuses, and whose tenure has produced stagnation, confusion, and decline, the administration has reinforced the bleak but widely held belief that Nigeria’s political system does not correct failure; it consecrates it. In this distorted moral economy, incompetence is not a liability that is penalized; it is, evidently, a credential that is celebrated. 

 

If this government genuinely believes in excellence, it should start by facing the grim state of Nigerian aviation, not by polishing the reputation of those allowing it to crumble. That would require uncomfortable truths, technocratic discipline, and leadership willing to subordinate personal loyalty to public interest. It would demand action rather than applause. What the sector desperately needs is not hollow praise, but honest reform: professional management insulated from politics, infrastructure overhaul based on real investment, and enforcement of standards that put safety and service above patronage. In the end, history will not remember the staged applause at the State House. It will remember whether Nigerian leaders had the courage to confront decay or the cowardice to decorate it with medals and call it reform. As it stands, this award is not a recognition of achievement. It is an official endorsement of failure. Right now, this award stands as little more than a medal pinned to mediocrity; a noisy celebration of failure at the top, while Nigeria’s aviation lies grounded.